Implants vs. Fat Grafting: Two Strategies for Breast Augmentation
Implants are practically synonymous with breast augmentation surgery, but San Francisco Bay Area plastic surgeon Dr. Eric Culbertson works
to educate his patients seeking a volume boost that there is also another
option: fat grafting.
“Augmentation” is a word for increasing something, whether
by a little or a lot. Both implants and fat grafting are effective augmentation
strategies, but each offers its own unique properties. Breast implants may be
ideal for one woman, while grafting is the more appropriate choice for another.
The decision depends on the degree of augmentation desired, the starting size
and shape of the breasts, and other factors.
Implants
Breast implants come in a range of sizes, shapes, textures,
and types, but they are all shells filled with a substance designed to add
volume and mimic breast tissue. Over the years, fillers have progressed from a
sterile saline solution to silicone gel to a form-stable silicone gel that is
better at staying in place in the event of a rupture.
Implants can either be inserted full, as with the
silicone-filled shells, or inserted empty and then filled with saline once in
place. The shells are fitted into pockets made specifically to accommodate them
in the breast itself, with the implant sitting above, below, or partially above
and partially below the chest muscle.
Incisions through which the implants are inserted may be
located directly in the breast tissue, such as on the areola or in the crease
below the breast, or they may be made some distance away, such as in the
underarm area. The breast-based incisions give the plastic surgeon the ability
to work with significant precision, and are generally adequately concealed at
the border of the areola or within the lower fold of the breast. An underarm
incision keeps scarring away from the breast, but the distance from the pocket
makes precision more challenging.
Fat Transfer
For anyone who has ever wished they could control where on
their body fat collects, fat transfer represents an ideal body-contouring
strategy. By using specialized tools similar to the instruments employed during
liposuction surgery, a plastic surgeon can remove fat from one area and, after
treating it, inject it elsewhere to add volume.
Fat transfer can be used for breast augmentation, making use
of a woman’s own fat taken from an ample donor area elsewhere on her body. The
realities of this procedure mean it is intended for patients with fat cells to
spare.
Because these fat injections are made up of living cells,
some women prefer it to implants for two reasons: It does not need to mimic
living tissue, as it is living
tissue, and the body does not treat the injected cells as foreign bodies, as it
may do with implants. Capsular contracture, for example, is a condition that
causes scar tissue to form around a breast implant, creating a hardened wall
that can squeeze the implant itself out of its natural shape. This is not a
concern with fat transfer.
Even small amounts of fat can make a visually noticeable
difference on the breasts. Fat transfer can be used to create more significant
curves, but can also be used for refining a look. It may even be combined with
breast implants to create the most natural-looking breast possible for a
patient, especially in cases of breast reconstruction.
There is no universal “right” way to perform a breast
augmentation. Each patient is a unique case, which is why a qualified plastic
surgeon will wait to recommend a specific course of action until after a
consultation with the woman seeking augmentation.
To learn more about fat transfer, breast augmentation, and
other plastic surgery options for the breasts and body, contact Dr. Eric
Culbertson at The Jacobs Center for
Cosmetic Surgery in Healdsburg by calling (707) 473-0220 or San Francisco at
(415) 433-0303. Send a message online via the practice’s Contact page.
Comments
Post a Comment